Показаны записи 11811 - 11820 из 56266
Who's Driving the Bus? 17
Have you ever seen an id? How about an infantile libidinal reaction-formation? Anybody who can talk like that has no business calling other people nuts.
Have you ever seen an id? How about an infantile libidinal reaction-formation? Anybody who can talk like that has no business calling other people nuts.
Who's Driving the Bus? 19
Fairly recently, physicists decided that Bohr's description of the atom is wrong. I wondered if they were going to take back his Nobel prize, but then I found out Bohr is dead, and he already spent the money. The really amazing thing is that all the discoveries that were made by using a "wrong" model are still here. The Naugahyde chairs didn't disappear when physicists changed their minds. Physics is usually presented as a very "objective" science, but I notice that physics changes and the world stays the same, so there must be something subjective about physics.
Fairly recently, physicists decided that Bohr's description of the atom is wrong. I wondered if they were going to take back his Nobel prize, but then I found out Bohr is dead, and he already spent the money. The really amazing thing is that all the discoveries that were made by using a "wrong" model are still here. The Naugahyde chairs didn't disappear when physicists changed their minds. Physics is usually presented as a very "objective" science, but I notice that physics changes and the world stays the same, so there must be something subjective about physics.
Who's Driving the Bus? 15
If you think I'm being hard on psychologists, just wait. You see, we people in the field of computer programming are so crazy that we can pick on anyone. Anybody who will sit in front of a computer for twenty-four hours a day, trying to reduce experience down to zeros and ones, is so far outside the world of normal an experience that I can say someone is crazy and still be
If you think I'm being hard on psychologists, just wait. You see, we people in the field of computer programming are so crazy that we can pick on anyone. Anybody who will sit in front of a computer for twenty-four hours a day, trying to reduce experience down to zeros and ones, is so far outside the world of normal an experience that I can say someone is crazy and still be
Who's Driving the Bus? 13
One client of mine couldn't get angry, because he would immediately get extremely scared. You could say he had a phobia of being angry. It turned out that when he was a child, any time he got mad, his parents got furious and scared him into the middle of next week, so those two feelings got linked together. He was own and hadn't lived with his parents for fifteen years, but he still responded that way.
One client of mine couldn't get angry, because he would immediately get extremely scared. You could say he had a phobia of being angry. It turned out that when he was a child, any time he got mad, his parents got furious and scared him into the middle of next week, so those two feelings got linked together. He was own and hadn't lived with his parents for fifteen years, but he still responded that way.
Who's Driving the Bus? 11
How many of you are haunted by thoughts? You say to yourself, "I wish I could get it out of my head." But isn't it amazing that you got it in there in the first place! Brains are really phenomenal. The things they'll get you to do are absolutely amazing. The problem with brains is not that they can't learn, as we have been told all too often. The problem with brains is that they learn things too quickly and too well. For example, think of a phobia. It's an amazing thing to be able to remember to get terrified every time you see a spider. You never find a phobic looking at a spider and saying, "Oh damn, I forgot to be afraid." Are there a few things you'd like to learn that thoroughly? When: you think about it that way, having a phobia is a tremendous learning achievement. And if you go into the person's history, you often find that it was one-trial learning: it took only one instantaneous experience for that person to learn something so thoroughly that she'll remember it for the rest of her life.
How many of you are haunted by thoughts? You say to yourself, "I wish I could get it out of my head." But isn't it amazing that you got it in there in the first place! Brains are really phenomenal. The things they'll get you to do are absolutely amazing. The problem with brains is not that they can't learn, as we have been told all too often. The problem with brains is that they learn things too quickly and too well. For example, think of a phobia. It's an amazing thing to be able to remember to get terrified every time you see a spider. You never find a phobic looking at a spider and saying, "Oh damn, I forgot to be afraid." Are there a few things you'd like to learn that thoroughly? When: you think about it that way, having a phobia is a tremendous learning achievement. And if you go into the person's history, you often find that it was one-trial learning: it took only one instantaneous experience for that person to learn something so thoroughly that she'll remember it for the rest of her life.
Who's Driving the Bus? 9
How many of you have ever thought about something that hadn't even happened yet, and felt bad about it ahead of time? Why wait? You may as well start feeling bad now, right? And then it didn't actually happen, after all. But you didn't miss out on that experience, did you?
How many of you have ever thought about something that hadn't even happened yet, and felt bad about it ahead of time? Why wait? You may as well start feeling bad now, right? And then it didn't actually happen, after all. But you didn't miss out on that experience, did you?
I want you to learn how to drive your own bus.
I want you to find out how you can learn to change your own experience, and get some control over what happens in your brain. Most people are prisoners of their own brains. It's as if they are chained to the last seat of the bus and someone else is driving. I want you to learn how to drive your own bus. If you don't give your brain a little direction, either it will just run randomly on its own, or other people will find ways to run it for you—and they may not always have your best interests in mind. Even if they do, they may get it wrong!
I want you to find out how you can learn to change your own experience, and get some control over what happens in your brain. Most people are prisoners of their own brains. It's as if they are chained to the last seat of the bus and someone else is driving. I want you to learn how to drive your own bus. If you don't give your brain a little direction, either it will just run randomly on its own, or other people will find ways to run it for you—and they may not always have your best interests in mind. Even if they do, they may get it wrong!
Who's Driving the Bus ?
Neuro-Linguistic Programming is a word that I made up to avoid having to be specialized in one field or another.; In college I was one of those people who couldn't make up my mind, and I decided to continue that way. One of the things that NLP represents is a way of looking at human learning. Although lots of psychologists and social workers use NLP to do what they call "therapy," I think it's more appropriate to describe NLP as an educational process. Basically we're developing ways to teach, people how to use their own brains.
Neuro-Linguistic Programming is a word that I made up to avoid having to be specialized in one field or another.; In college I was one of those people who couldn't make up my mind, and I decided to continue that way. One of the things that NLP represents is a way of looking at human learning. Although lots of psychologists and social workers use NLP to do what they call "therapy," I think it's more appropriate to describe NLP as an educational process. Basically we're developing ways to teach, people how to use their own brains.
http://metapractice.livejournal.com/469782.html
Introduction 7-5
I. Who's Driving the Bus? 7-19
Most of us let our brains run wild, and spend a lot of time having experiences we don't want to have. Bandler pokes fun at many of our current ways of attempting to think about and solve human problems, as he begins to provide alternatives.
Using Your Brain FORA CHANGE
RichardBandler
Introduction 7-5
I. Who's Driving the Bus? 7-19
Most of us let our brains run wild, and spend a lot of time having experiences we don't want to have. Bandler pokes fun at many of our current ways of attempting to think about and solve human problems, as he begins to provide alternatives.
Using Your Brain FORA CHANGE
RichardBandler
--–Сигналы откалибровать пока не удаётся.
--–Есть одна хитрость: (1) На первом шаге надо оперантно отформатировать амплитуду сигнала в ответ на любой вопрос так, чтобы сигнал не был ниже некоторой наперед заданной величины. Величину/амплитуду сигнала следует выбирать с запасом настолько, чтобы не было никаких сомнений в прохождении сигнала. Т.е. максимальная амплитуда должна превышать минимальную амплитуду раза в два.
--Тут следует учесть, что у термина "кожно-гальваническая реакция" есть строгое физическое/медицинское определение. Так вот, то что я измеряю, не соответствует этому определению. То есть измеряется некая относительная величина, напрямую связанная с электрическим сопротивлением кожи, но не являющаяся именно кожно-гальванической р.
Есть несколько вариантов строгого медицинского определения КГР
То что меряет твой прибор среди стандартных определений.
Иначе говоря, отлаживать приходится одновременно и "человеческий" уровень комплекса, и технический. Доступа к медицинскому/полиграфическому оборудованию нет, поэтому приходится использовать колхозные разработки :)
Дело не в колхозности прибора. Дело в том, что любой по содержанию показатель КГР подвержен БОС-динамике.
За счёт БОС динамики появляется возможность отформатировать/упорядочить сигнал. А затем его формировать.
В противном случае нужны "инструменты" для форматирования сигнала под калибровку нашего сигналинга.
В натуральной форме КГД показатели откалибровать под сигналинг весьма непросто - если совсем невозможно. Ибо любые варианты КГД обладают избыточной динамикой.
Поэтому, переводя инструкцию на то, что наблюдается на графике, понимаю так: (1.1) Добиться некоего стабильного фонового уровня сигнала. То есть значения сигнала с минимальными/нулевыми отклонениями. Это уже есть – наверное, сказывается опыт себе-рефреймингов.
Я в своих экспериментах такие параметры игнорировал. Для меня за "фон" принимались колебания сигнала в широком диапазоне, не выходящие за рамки некоторого интервала снизу и сверху.
Сигналом был выход показателя на контрольную величину и выше верхней границы показателей.
(1.2) Оперантно сформировать ПРЕВЫШЕНИЕ фонового уровня в ответ на вопрос (на заданную величину – например не менее 30 единиц) И ВОЗВРАЩЕНИЕ обратно к фоновому уровню (собственно, это формально и называется КГР-реакцией, насколько я понимаю) ЗА ЗАДАННОЕ ВРЕМЯ (например, не более 5 секунд). Так получается?
В моей системе измерений значение превышения великовато.
Время... не знаю - надо смотреть по месту.
--–Есть одна хитрость: (1) На первом шаге надо оперантно отформатировать амплитуду сигнала в ответ на любой вопрос так, чтобы сигнал не был ниже некоторой наперед заданной величины. Величину/амплитуду сигнала следует выбирать с запасом настолько, чтобы не было никаких сомнений в прохождении сигнала. Т.е. максимальная амплитуда должна превышать минимальную амплитуду раза в два.
--Тут следует учесть, что у термина "кожно-гальваническая реакция" есть строгое физическое/медицинское определение. Так вот, то что я измеряю, не соответствует этому определению. То есть измеряется некая относительная величина, напрямую связанная с электрическим сопротивлением кожи, но не являющаяся именно кожно-гальванической р.
Есть несколько вариантов строгого медицинского определения КГР
КГР во многих проявлениях
http://metapractice.livejournal.com/474625.html?thread=12130817#t12130817
То что меряет твой прибор среди стандартных определений.
Иначе говоря, отлаживать приходится одновременно и "человеческий" уровень комплекса, и технический. Доступа к медицинскому/полиграфическому оборудованию нет, поэтому приходится использовать колхозные разработки :)
Дело не в колхозности прибора. Дело в том, что любой по содержанию показатель КГР подвержен БОС-динамике.
За счёт БОС динамики появляется возможность отформатировать/упорядочить сигнал. А затем его формировать.
В противном случае нужны "инструменты" для форматирования сигнала под калибровку нашего сигналинга.
В натуральной форме КГД показатели откалибровать под сигналинг весьма непросто - если совсем невозможно. Ибо любые варианты КГД обладают избыточной динамикой.
Поэтому, переводя инструкцию на то, что наблюдается на графике, понимаю так: (1.1) Добиться некоего стабильного фонового уровня сигнала. То есть значения сигнала с минимальными/нулевыми отклонениями. Это уже есть – наверное, сказывается опыт себе-рефреймингов.
Я в своих экспериментах такие параметры игнорировал. Для меня за "фон" принимались колебания сигнала в широком диапазоне, не выходящие за рамки некоторого интервала снизу и сверху.
Сигналом был выход показателя на контрольную величину и выше верхней границы показателей.
(1.2) Оперантно сформировать ПРЕВЫШЕНИЕ фонового уровня в ответ на вопрос (на заданную величину – например не менее 30 единиц) И ВОЗВРАЩЕНИЕ обратно к фоновому уровню (собственно, это формально и называется КГР-реакцией, насколько я понимаю) ЗА ЗАДАННОЕ ВРЕМЯ (например, не более 5 секунд). Так получается?
В моей системе измерений значение превышения великовато.
Время... не знаю - надо смотреть по месту.
Дочитали до конца.