metanymous в посте Openmeta (оригинал в ЖЖ)
Metapractice | |||||
Иное моделирование | |||||
15. Ричард Бэндлер: "Моделирование – это математический навык" | metanymous | ||||
Re: Личность = "содержание". Моделирование глубже "личнос | immergent | ||||
Re: Личность = "содержание". Моделирование глубже "личнос | metanymous |
3 комментария
сначала старые сначала новые
...profound example of how meaning can influence perception. That is, what we actually see may very much depend on what we know about our world. I am convinced that such a general principal affects us all. A friend of mine who in the neuropsychology literature is known as ELM, has prosopagnosia. He used to tell me repeatedly, "if I were to unexpectedly meet you on the street, and look at your face, I would know that it is a face but the features would be all fuzzy and distorted. As soon as I hear your voice then your face just fills in". At the time I was unsure what ELM meant by this description, but knew it was important because of how many times ELM described this subjective experience. After working extensively on synaesthesia I now believe that he was describing as best he could how meaning influenced his perception. His brain damage has left him with problems with face identification, so when he sees a face he cannot access to whom the face belongs - Hence the face does not mean anything and appears distorted. As soon as he hears the person's voice, he can identify the person. Now the face means something, and the face, in ELM's words "fills in". As with C, form accesses meaning and meaning influences perception. For me studying synaesthesia has done no less than unlocked one of the keys to perception. What we see depends on what we know.