У Чарли были тебе-сигналы в рефрейминге — да двойное покашливание, нет одиночное. Пару раз перепроверил, повторились именно так. В бытовом общении у Чарли как и у всех нормальных людей ровно наоборот, да - одинарное, нет - двойное. Интересно.
http://metapractice.livejournal.com/199503.html?thread=5239375

В этом случае надо рассмотреть несколько возможностей:

(1) Чарли жуткая множественная личность. И вторая ее половина совершенно не контролируется первой. Поэтому, радикально меняются сигналы в разных контекстах.

(2) Чарли жуткая полярная личность. При этом он может/не может быть обязательно множественной личностью. Дело в том, что сильные полярные реакции могут развиваться и у обычной личности. Ну, а далее, гипотетический механизм прост: сознание и подсознание Чарли замечает типологию реагирования всех/большинства людей, и тогда Чарли начинает делать осознанное или не очень все наоборот.

(3) Еще одна возможность. Вот, мы не один раз обсуждали чем отличается моделирование и научное исследование:

моделирование и научная статистика
http://metapractice.livejournal.com/240780.html

...и в рамках этой темы не раз отмечали существование феномена "ПЕРВИЧНОГО МОДЕЛИРОВАНИЯ". Далее интерпретация строится так:

--Метатео приблизился к своему Чарли не в моделирующем настрое, а в другом близком к научному.
--При этом (он даже м.б. он это вспомнит), он примерно так думал: ну, проверю, действительно ли существуют эти самые "абсолютные сигналы" покашливания.
--И когда он так начал думать, он и перешел в этот около научный настрой, который отличается от моделирующего тем, что моделист базовые феномены, с которыми он работает, не подвергает сомнению и проверки. Но "ученый" ПРОСТО ОБЯЗАН ДЕЙСТВОВАТЬ С ТОЧНОСТЬЮ ДО НАОБОРОТ. Он обязан все подвергать сомнению и сравнению одного с другим
--Таким манером, на внутреннем ментальном интерфейсе нашего оператора Метатео, грубо говоря, было ДВЕ ВЗАИМОИСКЛЮЧАЮЩИЕ КАРТИНКИ/ОЗВУЧКИ. На одной сигналы были представлены в описанном мной форме. А на другой - в противоположной
--И Чарли, с которым работал Метатео, был достаточно пластичной личностью. Его/ее подсознание уловило, что оператору нужно выдать "что-то противоположное". И "противоположное" было выдано.
--уже на первые проявления "противоположного" наш оператор Метатео выдал свою собственную ответную реакцию "первичного моделирования" и ОНА ЗАКРЕПИЛА ИЗМЕНЕНИЕ ИСХОДНЫХ СИГНАЛОВ!

...ну, а я, в отличие от Метатео, никогда не подвергаю сомнению и перепроверки первичные феномены, которые я таким адским трудом набираю. Поэтому, ко всем, к кому я при приближаюсь, или даже у всех, кого я наблюаю через монитор, сигналы - "абсолютные сигналы " экспрессии подсознания одни и те же вот уже четверть века.

На самом деле, вы можете в совершенно свободной манере выбирать свою методологическую позицию. Что же касается выбранной мной - просто, она более экономная.

Но, тем не менее, кто-то может спросить: а что же - у вас вообще представления о первичных феноменах никогда не обновляются? А я бы ответил - обновляются! Только для такого обновления надо делать специальные отдельные процедуры перемоделирования чего либо заново. Но, во время текущей работы - никогда никаких перемоделирований и сомнений!

Вспомним на секунду достопочтенного мистера Гриндера в его наилучших образцах творчества. Он писал примерно так: "творческий демон может действовать только в строго ограниченном контексте/клетке". [И я надеюсь, что накопленный мной опыт моделирования дорос таки до уровня творческого (ах нет - на современном полит языке - КРЕАТИВНОГО!) демона.] Но, то что я вам описываю про контролируемые сомнения в первичных феноменах и способность/обязанность (!!) верить в их непогрешимость ПРЯМО ВО ВРЕМЯ РАБОТЫ есть вариант задания клетки/рабочего контекста для демона моделирования.

(the following is a gift from LiveJournal user "agens")
12 months of paid account time have been added to your LiveJournal account
"metapractice".
Take advantage of some of your paid account features:

Агенсу спасибо!

А вот, практику ежемесячных ему возвратов на указанный номер телефона мы продолжим.

Совершенно верно!

Ну вот :)

Как ты думаешь, почему Ильич не выпустил сразу номеров Правды на пару лет вперед? :)

Понемногу обо всем (28) Гиллиган забыл/но вспомнил нашу модель
http://metapractice.livejournal.com/309207.html

The other main way to reduce overwhelm is to put some distance between you and those mental events. For instance, if you are inside a large bright colorful loud movie of the events that you are attending to, your strong feelings will occupy much of your attention, and that will make it very difficult to deal with the events themselves. When you allow all that to recede until it is at a comfortable distance from you (for instance on a TV across the room) your images will be smaller, and your feelings will become less intense, giving you more attention to devote to whatever needs to be done. You can quickly scan though the movie and determine which events are relevant, and which can be ignored, at least temporarily. That will make it easier to focus on one aspect of the movie at a time, dividing the problem into smaller parts that will be easier to resolve.

One client who complained of overwhelm truly “had a lot on his mind.” He had six simultaneous color movies, each with blaring sound, as if they were on the inside of a little planetarium dome inside his mind. With all that going on internally, it was impossible for him to focus on any part of it, and he also had little attention left for external events in the moment.

I suggested that he first allow all six movies to slow down somewhat as they receded to a more comfortable distance. When he could see all six movies at a distance, I suggested that he scan them all quickly, and decide which one was most important to focus on at the moment.

Then I suggested that one movie could come somewhat closer to him so that he could see it more clearly, while the other five became silent as they transformed from colorful movies to black and white still images. Those black and white images became icons that indicated the overall content of those other movies, serving as reminders, so that he could easily return to any of them when that was appropriate.
http://realpeoplepress.com/blog/overcoming-overwhelm-fixed?utm_source=feedburner&utm_medium=email&utm_campaign=Feed%3A+SteveAndreasNlpBlog+%28Steve+Andreas%27+NLP+Blog%29

If you want to reduce auditory input, you can imagine being in a transparent sound-proof room, and if you want to hear one sound source, you can imagine having a directional microphone and headphones to allow you to do that. Or you could imagine having ears that rotate in different directions, the way a horse does. Or you could imagine a force-field surrounding you like a heavy curtain that muffles most sound, but is thinner in the direction of the sound that you want to attend to.

Recently I was at a small table with four other people. I was talking to the two people opposite me, while the two people on either side of me were also talking quite loudly to each other. I found that I had an image of the two conversations, as two different “lines” between the different people speaking. Somehow visualizing these two conversations as “lines” made it easier for me to attend to one of these “lines” of conversation and ignore the other.

We all also have had times when we disregarded kinesthetic sensations. When watching an engrossing movie, we typically ignore the feeling of the seat we are sitting on. At this moment you are probably not aware of the backs of your knees or your elbows—until I mention them, and then you attend to them, and become less aware of whatever you had been attending to previously. In an emergency, we may even be oblivious to the pain of serious injuries, because our attention is so focused on getting out of danger, or helping someone else.

Reducing internal input
There may also be a lot going on inside your mind during an experience of overwhelm. There are two ways to reduce overwhelm that are almost always useful, no matter what the content of your thoughts, One is to slow down your internal tempo, and allow events to unfold more slowly, so that you have more time to process them. You can do this in whichever of the three main sensory modalities is easiest for you. You could feel the tempo of your bodily movements slow down, you could hear the sound slow down, or you could see the moving images in your mind slow down—or do two or three of these choices simultaneously. When events are slowed down, the amount of information you have to process decreases significantly, and it will be much easier to process it in whatever way is appropriate.

Mood or feeling state
Finally, consider the emotional mood or feeling state you are in because of other factors that aren’t a result of the overwhelm itself. If you are tired at the end of a day, or your state is unpleasant or unresourceful, this would be an additional distracting internal input, demanding some of your attention and reducing what is available for the challenge you are facing. You can save yourself a lot of frustration if you first do something to change your state, or wait until you feel more resourceful. Some events actually need to be attended to right away, but most of the challenges that trouble us can easily be postponed for a day or two when we feel more alert and capable.

For instance, I went through several rounds of editing this article yesterday, and wanted to go through it at least one more time. But my mind was somewhat frazzled by that time, and I knew I couldn’t concentrate well, so I waited for this morning when I could read it with a fresh mind.

What can you do to change your state in a useful way when you are overwhelmed? Sometimes it is as simple as taking a short break for a stretch, a walk, to look at something beautiful, feel gratitude for something in your life, etc. At other times your feeling state may be so strong and lasting that you need to do something more to change it, A few hours of doing something you love, especially if it involves vigorous physical exercise to clear out all the bodily chemicals that are part of feeling bad, can do wonders for your state and effectiveness.

A good night’s sleep can improve your mood immeasurably. If I am tired at the end of the day, a task can seem overwhelming, but the next morning, I can clearly see what to do, and do it quickly and easily. Other people report that they function better late at night, which has always seemed very strange to me, because I am definitely a “morning person.” If you scan through your past memories you can find many examples of the importance of changing your state. If you study those examples you can learn what you did to make that happen. Then you can use that information to discover what works best for you, and apply that to the present and future, transforming hindsight into foresight.

Summary
So the next time you experience overwhelm, pause to find out how you can reduce the flow of information so that you can deal with what is most important to you in an effective way. The key aspects are to reduce external input, reduce internal input, prioritize, and make sure you are in a resourceful mood or feeling state. Teaching these skills to people who have been diagnosed as ADD or ADHD, or anyone else who has difficulty with overwhelm, can often be very, very helpful.