![[userpic]](/media/26d2bbfb3b8ac4c2e0c36a79d0b593d0e72fd8b0bc8e4a858c1d92ab89b63be6)
metanymous wrote:
The sound of speech in the recordings is significantly filtered. It turned out to impose great difficulties on identification of intonations.
The sound of speech in the recordings is significantly filtered. It turned out to impose great difficulties on identification of intonations.
4 комментария
сначала старые сначала новые
↩︎
vseslavrus
eugzol_lj replied:
Maybe Yandex [Yandex.Video - service that hosts the recordings - VseslavRus] re-converts the clips while uploading.
↩︎
vseslavrus
metanymous replied:
So, we should adjust our sensory acuity to this filtered content. I've almost done it. I'm preparing a test notation.
rbb74 wrote:
According to which rules does one make a notation? What instruments should I use? Now I'm making it by writing with coloured pencils over printed transcripts.
Can I post the image of my notation here?
According to which rules does one make a notation? What instruments should I use? Now I'm making it by writing with coloured pencils over printed transcripts.
Can I post the image of my notation here?
metanymous replied:
You should better make a notation with browser's humble means. In black-and-white font. We can show the intonations, for example, this way: (/\) words words words. Where (/\) expresses the literal movement of the intonation, and underline points at a group of words embraced with this intonation.
You should better make a notation with browser's humble means. In black-and-white font. We can show the intonations, for example, this way: (/\) words words words. Where (/\) expresses the literal movement of the intonation, and underline points at a group of words embraced with this intonation.