Technical offtopic ↑
vseslavrus в посте Metapractice (оригинал в ЖЖ)
| His voice goes with us | |||||
| 3. U.C.L.A - Philadelphia - Pasadena - Chicago - San Diego | metanymous | ||||
| Thread translation | vseslavrus | ||||
The sound of speech in the recordings is significantly filtered. It turned out to impose great difficulties on identification of intonations.
4 комментария
сначала старые сначала новые
eugzol_lj replied:
Maybe Yandex [Yandex.Video - service that hosts the recordings - VseslavRus] re-converts the clips while uploading.
Maybe Yandex [Yandex.Video - service that hosts the recordings - VseslavRus] re-converts the clips while uploading.
metanymous replied:
So, we should adjust our sensory acuity to this filtered content. I've almost done it. I'm preparing a test notation.
So, we should adjust our sensory acuity to this filtered content. I've almost done it. I'm preparing a test notation.
rbb74 wrote:
According to which rules does one make a notation? What instruments should I use? Now I'm making it by writing with coloured pencils over printed transcripts.
Can I post the image of my notation here?
According to which rules does one make a notation? What instruments should I use? Now I'm making it by writing with coloured pencils over printed transcripts.
Can I post the image of my notation here?
metanymous replied:
You should better make a notation with browser's humble means. In black-and-white font. We can show the intonations, for example, this way: (/\) words words words. Where (/\) expresses the literal movement of the intonation, and underline points at a group of words embraced with this intonation.
You should better make a notation with browser's humble means. In black-and-white font. We can show the intonations, for example, this way: (/\) words words words. Where (/\) expresses the literal movement of the intonation, and underline points at a group of words embraced with this intonation.