Re: Blink and Snake signals consequential comments ↑

metanymous 09 октября 2004, 10:00 в посте Openmeta (оригинал в ЖЖ)

I was suprised that you indicate snake signal AFTER what is said, but blinking signal BEFORE what is said--this is also an evidence for the fact that blinking signal is associated with something more immediately dynamic (i.e., processing). As well as the fact that you used different formatting, and examples of snake signal are marked as if said out loud by you, while you was writing :-)

Что-то я не пойму что с этим мудрить. Все вполне просто:

--движения языка просто прерывают речь

--движения век ей не мешают

2 комментария

сначала старые сначала новые

</>

Re: Blink and Snake signals consequential comments

dvv7 10 октября 2004, 15:04 (оригинал в ЖЖ)

This does not answer why one signal goes after, and the other before. How showing Snake Signal before a phrase would impact spelling. And don't offer speed argument, because even if the signal is after the phrase, there is next phrase goes rather quickly and signal does not create an obstacle for it. Blink Signal slows people down as well.

Also, there are cases of DELETION in language, so that you can observe the signal but do not hear the phrase of Deep Structure to which it refers to.

Hypotheis A. Neurological constraint: for some hardwired reasons, it is not possible to put Snake singnal before the phrase.

This hypothesis supports that Blinking means unfinished prosessing.

Hypotheis B. Snake signal is a marker, while Blink signal is more processual one.

</>

Re: Blink and Snake signals consequential comments

metanymous 20 октября 2004, 04:26 (оригинал в ЖЖ)

Hypotheis B. Snake signal is a marker, while Blink signal is more processual one.

_____________________________________

Нет это не так. Оба сигнала, в каком-то смысле маркеры. Но моргание может быть "размазанным"/рассредоточенным маркером.