http://metapractice.livejournal.com/252375.html

---

As with any complex perceptual-motor skill, what's required is that the task be organized into small pieces or chunks, so that you can practice each small chunk individually until you've mastered it. Once you have succeeded in practicing each chunk to the point that it becomes an automatic, effective, unconscious skill, you are free to attend to new possibilities: other components of the task. You can then practice these new chunks until they also achieve that same status of an unconscious, effective, perceptual-motor pattern that you do not have to give any conscious attention to.

---

Как с любым сложным перцептуально-моторным навыком, что требуется так это чтобы задача была организована в маленькие части или кусочки, так что вы можете практиковать каждый маленький кусочек индивидуально пока вы не освоете его. Однажды вы станете успешным в практиковании каждого кусочка до точки, в которой он становится автоматическим, эффективным, бессознательным навыком, тогда вы свободы уделять внимание новым возможностям: другим компонентам задачи. Вы можете затем практиковать эти новые кусочки пока они также не достигнут того же статуса бессознательного, эффективного, перцептивно-моторного паттерна, которому вы не должны уделять никакого сознательного внимания.

---

Разделим на элементы, уберём лексику связок:

---

As with any complex peceptual-motor skill

---

What's required

---

Is that

---

The task be organized into small pieces or chunks

---

So that

---

You can practice each small chunk individually

---

Until

---

You've mastered it.

---

Once you have succeeded in practicing each chunk

---

To the point that

---

It becomes an automatic, effective, unconscious skill

---

You are free to attend to new possibilities

---

Other components of task

---

You can

---

Then

---

Practice these new chunks

---

Until

---

They also achieve that same status

---

Of

---

An unconscious, effective

---

Perceptual-motor pattern

---

That

---

You do not have to give any conscious attention

---

To

---

Перцептивно-двигательный навык

---

- требуется нечто

---

- задача организована в маленькие кусочки

---

- вы можете практиковать

---

- вы практикуете каждый маленький кусочек

---

- вы практикуете каждый маленький кусочек индивидуально

---

- вы научились ему

---

- однажды вы научились каждому кусочку

---

- есть точка обучения

---

- он становится автоматическим, эффективным, бессознательным навыком

---

- вы свободны уделить внимание

---

- есть новые новые возможности

---

- другие компоненты задачи

---

- вы можете

---

- практиковать эти новые кусочки

---

- они также получат тот же статус

---

- бессознательного, эффективного

---

- перцептивно-моторного паттерна

---

- вы не должны уделять сознательное внимание

---

- ему

---

Соберём в обратном порядке, сгладив стыки:

---

Кое-чему вы не должны уделять никакого сознательного внимания. А именно, перцептивно-двигательному паттерну, эффективному и бессознательному. Статус которого достигают повторяющейся практикой неких новых кусочков, а появляется возможность заниматься такой практикой, когда появляются новые компоненты некоей задачи, являющиеся новыми возможностями, которым вы получили способность уделять внимание, после того как нечто стало бессознательным навыком, автоматическим и эффективным. К этой точке вы приходите, однажды добившись успеха в практиковании каждого из кусочков. Точно такой же статус, как у некоей вещи, которой вы овладели, потому что вы снова и снова практиковали отдельный кусочек этой вещи. Вы могли это делать, поскольку задача была организована в маленькие части или кусочки. Именно такое требование для любого перцептивно-моторного навыка.

---

http://metapractice.livejournal.com/252375.html?thread=8784087#t8784087

---

Автоматический переводчик обратной нотации

---

http://vexer.ru/jokez/joda.php

---

http://metapractice.livejournal.com/333618.html

---

Milton Erickson 1952 U.C.L.A 01

---

---

Milton Erickson 1952 U.C.L.A 01

---

Now, my topic for this afternoon is … eh … control of physiological functions by hypnosis. And I'm also enlisted later for hypnotic approaches in therapy. Actually, of course, I have a feeling that it is rather difficult thing to do because in any approach to physiological control one also makes use of therapeutic approaches also. And so I'm not really going to try to make a differentiation or to try to make a [00:47 – 00:48] lecture on the subject. Both topics involve a question of techniques and the both concern with the adequate functioning of the individual as the personality and his functioning in a desired manner. [01:10]

---

Milton Erickson 1955 Philadelphia 1 - Misconceptiions & phenomena

---

---

Milton Erickson 1955 Philadelphia 1 - Misconceptiions & phenomena

---

[до этого идет приветствие, речь МЭ начинается на 0:40]

---

One of the first misconceptions that I want to mention is not listed in your booklet. And that is this. Misconception that you can learn hypnosis from a stage hypnotist. You can learn hypnotist from a stage hypnotist, if you want to work on the stage, but if you want to do medical work or dental work or psychological work, I don’t think that you can learn from a stage hypnotist. It requires a great deal of study in earnest effort and sincere effort on your part.

---

Another misconception that I want to mention isn’t included is (that) anybody who uses hypnosis must have some very special powers, special knowledge, special abilities. Actually, of course, hypnosis is a very common phenomenon in all human living, and anybody who can communicate with somebody else, can use hypnosis. Anybody, that can communicate with somebody else, can learn hypnosis and utilize it.

---

[02:01]

---

Milton Erickson 1958 Pasadena Track 1

---

---

Milton Erickson 1958 Pasadena Track 1

---

[до этого идет приветствие, речь МЭ начинается на 0:09]

---

Now hypnosis is a phenomenon, that requires participation and I'm gonna ask participation of the part of the audience, because part of your instruction, part of your training should include some efforts on your part to learn and to practice. Now, I'm not going to try to teach you medicine or any of the specialties of any sort. I made mention this specialty or that specialty or this field of medicine or another. But I want you to realize that hypnosis is a technique, a methodology and approach to the patient. And that I expect you to have that amount of medical knowledge requisite for you to practice your own field. And that you use hypnosis to facilitate the contact with the patient to enable a patient to comprehend you better and to motivate your patient in the acceptance of medical care and guidance and advice and instruction. The hypnosis is primarily a method of communicating ideas to people. In hypnosis you establish upon the person into a trance eh state of receptiveness to the ideas and as they are receptive to the ideas then they become responsive to the ideas.

---

Milton Erickson 1960 Chicago 1

---

---

Milton Erickson 1960 Chicago 1

---

Too often in working with patient you politely try not to notice his resistance, you politely try to overlook it and to pretend that it isn't there. But do you treat your patient that way [0:20 – 0:22 – три слова непонятны] do you ever pretend that your patient hasn't got a gynaecological review, do you ever pretend that you OB patient isn't pregnant, why should you pretend that your resistant patient isn't resistant? You ought to accept their resistance as one of the things they bring into the office. And since they brought it, you ought to use it. You are put to willing to use their eyes, you are put to willing to use their ears [0:50 – 0:55 – не уверен насчет put], their mouth, why not use their ressistance? And so, usually dealing with the ressistant patient, you recognize that they're resistant. [1.07]

---

Milton Erickson 1960 Chicago 2

---

---

Milton Erickson 1960 Chicago 2

---

Now this question of double-bind. I think it's awfully important that you exercise that double-bind in your therapy. Because why it's called a “double-bind”, it is a measure of getting your patient to face the issues at hand, because too often your patient is unwilling to face the issues. I think of one woman oh eh complained about a lump in her breast. And I think there were some 26 different physicians she consulted, and that all advised her to go into the hospital and have her breast operate on. [01:01]

---

Milton Erickson 1962 San Diego – That which occurs within

---

---

Milton Erickson 1962 San Diego – That which occurs within

---

But eh this time I'd like to take up certain other things that should be of interest to you. … [обрезка, запись внезапно начинается] this matter of the use of hypnosis I find as an editor of a journal that I am having a tremendous amount of competition. I find that the American Journal of Proctology is now publishing articles on hypnosis I would like to publish. The Journal of Anes... ehm Dermatology is publishing articles on hypnosis. In fact all of the various medical journals are publishing increasingly a large number of articles on hypnosis. And in spite of the hostility eh of general medical profession, especially in the older ranks, and the hostility of the dental profession the entrenched members of dental profession and the psychological profession hypnosis is beginning to spread increasingly. [0:01:18]

---

Milton Erickson 1962 San Diego – Common sense suggestion

---

---

Milton Erickson 1962 San Diego – Common sense suggestion

---

I've been asked to come in on several things. One of them is this matter of imaginary allergy. Wherein the patient tells you that he has a severe allergic response, when you know that it's not chemically possible for him to have a severe allergic response. Over (?) the experience of one of my friends eh in decades that one should take seriously this question of idiosyncrasy for drugs. One of my friends when he sustained practice in medicine wrote up prescription for aspirine for a patient. [01:02]

---