[userpic]

The Fundamental Strategy 

metanymous в посте Metapractice (оригинал в ЖЖ)


Frank and I have considered how to manage these issues. We have set-
tled on a specifc strategy. We have determined to pursue the mini-
mization of these particular classes of distortion by calling upon a
large number of people who were physically present and participated
in or observed some of the events that are herein described. A few are
names that are widely recognized in the present day feld of NLP; most
are people who are unknown and largely inactive with respect to the
patterning of the NLP of today – people who have no particular clear
known agenda. Mark carefully what they report.
You will fnd in this book the voices of people who moved resolutely,
wandered, and/or often stumbled (most of all the co-authors of this
book) through these events, each of whom carried with them specifc
personal agendas and perceptual flters which ensured that their per-
ceptions and thus subsequently their reconstructed memories of these
events would be quite distinct, especially with the passage of time (now
some 40 years). Many of these diferences arise through the ubiqui-
tous and selective perceptual fltering that necessarily results from the
strong limitations of the bandwidth of consciousness (7 + or – chunks
of information).
I would venture that few of the distortions that occur in such recon-
structions are deliberate. Tis lack of explicit awareness of the fltering
and its consequences, and the unconsciously motivated personal agen-
das of the people responsible for these deviations from what actually
happened (now largely unknowable), makes such distortions all the
more problematic, both with respect to the task of discovering what
the distortion is/was and what it is/was a distortion of – that is, devia-
tions from what actually happened.
But surely one of the most obvious and powerful conclusions from the
development and deployment of patterning over the last four decades
in NLP, and easily verifed in the reader’s own experience, is the aston-
ishing diversity in the descriptions that emerge from any single event
when described from the distinct perceptual positions of the people
who directly participated in or witnessed the event in question.