Часть 2  ↑

B. Other Useful Transformational Work
Bever, T. G. "The Cognitive Basis of Linguistic Structure."
In J. Hayes (ed.), Cognition and the Developments of
Language. New York: John Wiley and Sons, 1970. An
excellent account of how language as a representational
system might be connected to general modeling
abilities of human beings - especially the way that
children develop these abilities.
Fillmore, C. "The Case for Case." In E. Bach and R. Harms
(eds.), Universals in Linguistic Theory. New Y ork:
Holt, Rinehart and Winston, 1968. A readable account
of a somewhat different version of the transformational
model - useful suggestions about what a complete
representation of reference structure might be.
Greene, G. "How to Get People to Do Things With
Words." In Papers from the 8th Regional Meeting of
the Chicago Linguistic Society. Chicago, I I I.: U n iversity
of Chicago, 1970. An excellent example of the
Generative Semantics approach which we f e e l will contribute
much to an enlarged Meta-model for therapy.
Grinder, J . On Deletion Phenomena in English. The Hague:
Mouton, 1974. Very technical; useful for discussion of
different types of deletion. See Chapters 1,2, and 3.
Gruber, J. "Studies in Lexical Relations." Unpublished
doctoral dissertation, MIT, 1965. Excellent suggestion
for a complete representation of reference structures.
Horn, L. "A Presuppositional Analysis of Only and Even."
In Papers from the 5th Regional Meeting of the
Chicago Linguistic Society. Chicago, Ill.: University of
Chicago, 1969. Another fine example of the Generative
Semantics type of research which we feel will contribute
to an enlarged Meta-model for therapy.
Kartunnen, L. "Remarks on Presuppositions." At the
Texas Conference on Performances, Conversational
Implicature and Presuppositions, mimeograph, March
1973. Kartunnen has a series of incisive papers on
presuppositional phenomena in English. We suggest
you write to him directly at the University of Texas
for copies.
Katz, J. Semantic Theory. New York: Harper and Row,
1972. A most up-to-date account of the kind of semantic
theory most compatible with non-Generative
Semantics transformational grammar.
Lakoff, G. Linguistics and Natural Logic. Ann Arbor,
Mich.: University of Michigan, 1970. A valuable compendium
of some of the more recent work in Genera-
tive Semantics by i t s most prolific spokesperson. G.
Lakoff is presently at the University of California,
Berkeley.
McCawley, J. "Lexical Insertion in a Transformational
Grammar." I n Papers from the 4th Regional Meeting
of the Chicago Linguistic Society. Chicago, Ill.: U niversity
of Chicago, 1968. One of the initial articles establishing
Generative Semantics; good suggestions about
the representation of reference structures.
Postal, P. "On the Derivation of Pseudo-Adjectives." Paper
delivered to the 44th Annual Meeting of the LSA,
1969.
Postal, P. "On the Surface Verb Remind." In Linguistic
Inquiry, 7; 1 :37-120. Postal's work is highly theoretical;
the first reference has excellent examples o f the
patterns of derivation as Deep Structure Predicates are
mapped into Surface Structure Adjectives. The second
reference is very useful in making suggestions about
the representation of reference structures.
Ross, J. R. "On Declarative Sentences." I n R. Jacobs and
P. Rosen bau m, Readings in English Transformational
Grammar. Waltham, Mass.: Ginn/Blaisdell, 1970. This
i s the linguistic basis for the section in Chapter 4 called
The Last Performative and an excellent example of
linguistic analysis.
Sapir, E. The Selected Writing of Edward Sapir. D. Mandelbaum
(ed.). University of California Press, Berkeley,
1963. One of the classical linguists who had a fine
sensitivity for modeling.
Searle, J. Speech Acts. Cambridge, England: Cambridge
University Press, 1969. A modern work in pragmatics
with the transformational model as a basis. Readable.
Whorf, B. "Grammatical Categories." In J . E. Carroll (ed.),
Language, Thought and Reality. New York: John
Wiley and Sons, 1956. Another classical linguist who
addressed the issue of the way language shapes
perception.