B. Other Useful Transformational WorkBever, T. G. "The Cognitive Basis of Linguistic Structure."In J. Hayes (ed.), Cognition and the Developments ofLanguage. New York: John Wiley and Sons, 1970. Anexcellent account of how language as a representationalsystem might be connected to general modelingabilities of human beings - especially the way thatchildren develop these abilities.Fillmore, C. "The Case for Case." In E. Bach and R. Harms(eds.), Universals in Linguistic Theory. New Y ork:Holt, Rinehart and Winston, 1968. A readable accountof a somewhat different version of the transformationalmodel - useful suggestions about what a completerepresentation of reference structure might be.Greene, G. "How to Get People to Do Things WithWords." In Papers from the 8th Regional Meeting ofthe Chicago Linguistic Society. Chicago, I I I.: U n iversityof Chicago, 1970. An excellent example of theGenerative Semantics approach which we f e e l will contributemuch to an enlarged Meta-model for therapy.Grinder, J . On Deletion Phenomena in English. The Hague:Mouton, 1974. Very technical; useful for discussion ofdifferent types of deletion. See Chapters 1,2, and 3.Gruber, J. "Studies in Lexical Relations." Unpublisheddoctoral dissertation, MIT, 1965. Excellent suggestionfor a complete representation of reference structures.Horn, L. "A Presuppositional Analysis of Only and Even."In Papers from the 5th Regional Meeting of theChicago Linguistic Society. Chicago, Ill.: University ofChicago, 1969. Another fine example of the GenerativeSemantics type of research which we feel will contributeto an enlarged Meta-model for therapy.Kartunnen, L. "Remarks on Presuppositions." At theTexas Conference on Performances, ConversationalImplicature and Presuppositions, mimeograph, March1973. Kartunnen has a series of incisive papers onpresuppositional phenomena in English. We suggestyou write to him directly at the University of Texasfor copies.Katz, J. Semantic Theory. New York: Harper and Row,1972. A most up-to-date account of the kind of semantictheory most compatible with non-GenerativeSemantics transformational grammar.Lakoff, G. Linguistics and Natural Logic. Ann Arbor,Mich.: University of Michigan, 1970. A valuable compendiumof some of the more recent work in Genera-tive Semantics by i t s most prolific spokesperson. G.Lakoff is presently at the University of California,Berkeley.McCawley, J. "Lexical Insertion in a TransformationalGrammar." I n Papers from the 4th Regional Meetingof the Chicago Linguistic Society. Chicago, Ill.: U niversityof Chicago, 1968. One of the initial articles establishingGenerative Semantics; good suggestions aboutthe representation of reference structures.Postal, P. "On the Derivation of Pseudo-Adjectives." Paperdelivered to the 44th Annual Meeting of the LSA,1969.Postal, P. "On the Surface Verb Remind." In LinguisticInquiry, 7; 1 :37-120. Postal's work is highly theoretical;the first reference has excellent examples o f thepatterns of derivation as Deep Structure Predicates aremapped into Surface Structure Adjectives. The secondreference is very useful in making suggestions aboutthe representation of reference structures.Ross, J. R. "On Declarative Sentences." I n R. Jacobs andP. Rosen bau m, Readings in English TransformationalGrammar. Waltham, Mass.: Ginn/Blaisdell, 1970. Thisi s the linguistic basis for the section in Chapter 4 calledThe Last Performative and an excellent example oflinguistic analysis.Sapir, E. The Selected Writing of Edward Sapir. D. Mandelbaum(ed.). University of California Press, Berkeley,1963. One of the classical linguists who had a finesensitivity for modeling.Searle, J. Speech Acts. Cambridge, England: CambridgeUniversity Press, 1969. A modern work in pragmaticswith the transformational model as a basis. Readable.Whorf, B. "Grammatical Categories." In J . E. Carroll (ed.),Language, Thought and Reality. New York: JohnWiley and Sons, 1956. Another classical linguist whoaddressed the issue of the way language shapesperception.
B. Other Useful Transformational Work(1) Bever, T. G. "The Cognitive Basis of Linguistic Structure." In J. Hayes (ed.), Cognition and the Developments of Language. New York: John Wiley and Sons, 1970.An excellent account of how language as a representational system might be connected to general modeling abilities of human beings - especially the way that children develop these abilities.(2) Fillmore, C. "The Case for Case." In E. Bach and R. Harms (eds.), Universals in Linguistic Theory. New Y ork: Holt, Rinehart and Winston, 1968.A readable account of a somewhat different version of the transformational model - useful suggestions about what a complete representation of reference structure might be.(3) Greene, G. "How to Get People to Do Things With Words." In Papers from the 8th Regional Meeting of the Chicago Linguistic Society. Chicago, III.: University of Chicago, 1970.An excellent example of the Generative Semantics approach which we feel will contribute much to an enlarged Meta-model for therapy.(4) Grinder, J . On Deletion Phenomena in English. The Hague: Mouton, 1974.Very technical; useful for discussion of different types of deletion. See Chapters 1,2, and 3. Gruber, J. "Studies in Lexical Relations." Unpublished doctoral dissertation, MIT, 1965. Excellent suggestion for a complete representation of reference structures.(5) Horn, L. "A Presuppositional Analysis of Only and Even." In Papers from the 5th Regional Meeting of the Chicago Linguistic Society. Chicago, Ill.: University of Chicago, 1969.Another fine example of the Generative Semantics type of research which we feel will contribute to an enlarged Meta-model for therapy.(6) Kartunnen, L. "Remarks on Presuppositions." At the Texas Conference on Performances, Conversational Implicature and Presuppositions, mimeograph, March 1973.Kartunnen has a series of incisive papers on presuppositional phenomena in English. We suggest you write to him directly at the University of Texas for copies.(7) Katz, J. Semantic Theory. New York: Harper and Row, 1972.A most up-to-date account of the kind of semantic theory most compatible with non-Generative Semantics transformational grammar.
(8) Lakoff, G. Linguistics and Natural Logic. Ann Arbor, Mich.: University of Michigan, 1970.A valuable compendium of some of the more recent work in Generative Semantics by it`s most prolific spokesperson. G. Lakoff is presently at the University of California, Berkeley.(9) McCawley, J. "Lexical Insertion in a Transformational Grammar." In Papers from the 4th Regional Meeting of the Chicago Linguistic Society. Chicago, Ill.: University of Chicago, 1968.One of the initial articles establishing Generative Semantics; good suggestions about the representation of reference structures.(10) Postal, P. "On the Derivation of Pseudo-Adjectives." Paper delivered to the 44th Annual Meeting of the LSA, 1969.Postal, P. "On the Surface Verb Remind." In Linguistic Inquiry, 7; 1 :37-120. Postal's work is highly theoretical; the first reference has excellent examples of the patterns of derivation as Deep Structure Predicates are mapped into Surface Structure Adjectives. The second reference is very useful in making suggestions about the representation of reference structures.(11) Ross, J. R. "On Declarative Sentences." In R. Jacobs and P. Rosen baum, Readings in English Transformational Grammar. Waltham, Mass.: Ginn/Blaisdell, 1970.This is the linguistic basis for the section in Chapter 4 called The Last Performative and an excellent example of linguistic analysis.(12) Sapir, E. The Selected Writing of Edward Sapir. D. Mandelbaum (ed.). University of California Press, Berkeley, 1963.One of the classical linguists who had a fine sensitivity for modeling.(13) Searle, J. Speech Acts. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press, 1969.A modern work in pragmatics with the transformational model as a basis. Readable.(14) Whorf, B. "Grammatical Categories." In J . E. Carroll (ed.), Language, Thought and Reality. New York: John Wiley and Sons, 1956.Another classical linguist who addressed the issue of the way language shapes perception.