![[userpic]](http://localhost:4000/images/none.gif)
... ↑
bionycks в посте Openmeta (оригинал в ЖЖ)
Holographic dynamics.
------
Почему голографическая?
Почему динамика?
должны являться спонтанными проявлениями Субстрата без их специальной установки. Установка сигналов - это уже эффекты дополнительных техник.
Huh-huh, no, you can't avoid that mix. Then, we may talks about levels of development of signals (however natural, that's not the point),
---------
Уровни развития Сигналов - как вы их определяете?
for example, some people have active and associated *SnakeMouth, some have it loose. Both are without special conscious knowledge.
-------------
как я понимаю, в обоих случаях ЯзыковаяРаекция будет оставаться self-rewarding reaction/ для Субстрата ее выдающего.
In fact, signals which you install tend to be more powerful than natural!!
----------
Ну да, если с позиций воздействия СигналящегоСубстрата на СубстратВоспринимающий, особенно если сигналит "тренированный" Субстрат)
Но здесь мы описываем/фиксируем Сигнал на первой стадии - на стадии когда Субстрат Чарли (и тольок Чарли) его нам только предложил. Это - информация. Ее можно истолковать. Как такая информация будет использована в коммуникации - здесь начинаются специальные техники утилизации сигнала, это вопрос отдельный. В этом постинге собираются изначальные сигналы, окторыми Чарли СебеМаркирует.
3 комментария
сначала старые сначала новые
I see the overall direction and I see your scientific objective thinkiing :)
Consequentially,
Then, here is a risk to end-up with bunch of neurology and random diverse set of "natual signals"--*SnakeMouth is not that lateral and universal--in fact, you won't find anything universal, except the Universe itself. You have 6 billion people with EACH being individual system of meaning behind signalling. You also miss the POTENTIAL, it's not what an untrained Charlie do, it's what his or her neurology is capable of.
Besides, signal, even non-verbal, is still communicaiton that has meaning and pattern and validity in its context. This is to say that "installed signals" is not imposition upon their unconscious -- it is AGREEMENT between yours and their Substrat, and therefore signlas work! This is not trivia, you can read from the last Piter's group meeting about their diffiuclties for getting signals that work -- developing rapport agreement.
You do have the choice to become that Charlie to learn his self-marking. This is classic NLP modelling of JG design. But that involves not only a skill... but physiological changes -- do you want to have pysical problems and depression chemistry of your clients? I mean it is a way with it's precautions, but there should be better ones.
Or we need to learn the art of Zen.
Consequentially,
Then, here is a risk to end-up with bunch of neurology and random diverse set of "natual signals"--*SnakeMouth is not that lateral and universal--in fact, you won't find anything universal, except the Universe itself. You have 6 billion people with EACH being individual system of meaning behind signalling. You also miss the POTENTIAL, it's not what an untrained Charlie do, it's what his or her neurology is capable of.
Besides, signal, even non-verbal, is still communicaiton that has meaning and pattern and validity in its context. This is to say that "installed signals" is not imposition upon their unconscious -- it is AGREEMENT between yours and their Substrat, and therefore signlas work! This is not trivia, you can read from the last Piter's group meeting about their diffiuclties for getting signals that work -- developing rapport agreement.
You do have the choice to become that Charlie to learn his self-marking. This is classic NLP modelling of JG design. But that involves not only a skill... but physiological changes -- do you want to have pysical problems and depression chemistry of your clients? I mean it is a way with it's precautions, but there should be better ones.
Or we need to learn the art of Zen.
I'll take it into account remembering a fact that every human has a similar neurology.
Exactly, a similar
not the same.
not the same.