... ↑
ailev в посте Openmeta (оригинал в ЖЖ)
Однако, первая наша Концепция, в которой непосредственно применен "интегральный" заход Уилбера (в классическом "желтом" заходе спиральной динамики) уже написана (thecroaker) -- это http://www.prompolit.ru/151796 и сопутствующая презентация http://www.prompolit.ru/files/159073/personal_info_2-11.ppt
А хочется мне дочесть до такого:
Excerpt G: Toward A Comprehensive Theory of Subtle Energies
Part II. An Integral Theory of Subtle Energies
The Spectrum of Subtle Energies
As usual, let's first touch bases with the wisdom traditions, then see how their profound insights might be updated with AQAL.
Common to many traditions is the idea that, in addition to a spectrum of consciousness, there is a spectrum of energy. One such spectrum runs from gross physical energy, to etheric energy, to astral energy, to psychic energy, to causal energy. Without, at this point, arguing the details, let's simply accept that as a type of subtle-energy spectrum that might exist.
In a general sense (which we will refine as we go along), these 5 levels of energy are essentially correlated with the 5 levels of consciousness (e.g., as presented in fig. 1). According to the traditions, these energies are not the same as consciousness; consciousness cannot be reduced to these energies; nor can these energies be reduced to consciousness. Rather, these levels of energy accompany and support their correlative levels of consciousness (so that a gross energy is the support of gross consciousness, a subtle energy is the support of subtle consciousness, a causal energy is the support of causal consciousness, and so on).
You could represent the energy spectrum very much as in, say, figure 2 (physical energy, vital energy, mental energy, soul energy). Every level of both consciousness and energy higher than the lowest level (or "matter") was completely trans-material (metaphysical, supernatural). These energies were said to form concentric spheres of increasing expanse, but they are themselves, in every essential way, non-gross-material (or ontologically pre-existing and separable from matter).
The essential points of that formulation can still be true, and are true, I believe. But with the naturalistic turn in the AQAL matrix's self-understanding, we can recognize that many of the items that the premodern traditions believed were entirely trans-material or meta-physical are actually correlated with complexifications of matter, not a mere transcendence of matter.
We suggested that this naturalization of metaphysical occasions has three important components: complexity of gross form (in the UR) is correlated with an increasing degree of consciousness (in the UL), and, in the UR itself, a subtilization of corresponding energies. We can depict this, somewhat crudely, as in figure 7.
Это отсюда: http://wilber.shambhala.com/html/books/kosmos/excerptG/part2.cfm
Эх...